Back to Help
Methodology

Quality Score Methodology

Every climate disclosure in the CRD platform receives a quality score from 0 to 100. This guide explains exactly how scores are calculated so you can understand, compare, and improve disclosure quality.

Overall Score Formula

Overall
0 – 100
=(
Completeness
+
Quantification
+
Governance
+
Target Ambition
)÷
4

Each dimension is weighted equally at 25%. The final score is rounded to 2 decimal places.

The Four Dimensions

Completeness

Did you report on all topics?

Governance disclosures (oversight, expertise, committees, roles, remuneration)20 pts
Strategy disclosures (impacts, scenarios, transition plan, time horizons)20 pts
Risk Management disclosures (tools, framework, risk register)20 pts
Metrics disclosures (Scope 1/2/3, intensity, risk metrics)20 pts
Additional disclosures (assurance, materiality, value chain, frameworks)20 pts

Quantification

Did you use real numbers?

Scope 1 Emissions (total, by source, measurement standard)15 pts
Scope 2 Emissions (location-based, market-based, renewable %)15 pts
Scope 3 Emissions (up to 10 categories reported)20 pts
Financial Impacts (current + anticipated quantified)20 pts
Emissions Intensity metrics (up to 3 metrics)15 pts
Scenario Analysis (quantitative + any scenarios)15 pts

Governance

Who's in charge of climate?

Board oversight (description + reporting frequency)20 pts
Climate expertise (members + description)20 pts
Dedicated climate/sustainability committee20 pts
Remuneration linked to climate (linkage + details)20 pts
Management accountability (roles with responsibilities)20 pts

Target Ambition

How ambitious are your goals?

Net Zero or Carbon Neutral target declared20 pts
Target year (earlier = higher score)20 pts
Scope coverage (Scope 1, 2, and 3 included)20 pts
Interim targets (milestones before 2050)20 pts
Science-Based Targets alignment (SBTi)20 pts

Score Interpretation

Scores map to five maturity tiers. These apply to both the overall score and each individual dimension.

0 - 20Early Stage
21 - 40Developing
41 - 60Established
61 - 80Advanced
81 - 100Leading

Technical Scoring Details

Detailed point-by-point breakdown for each dimension. Field names shown in monospace correspond to the underlying data model.

Dimension 1: Completeness Score

Scale: 0 – 100  |  5 sections, each worth 20 points maximum

Governance Section (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
oversightDescriptionPresent (non-null, non-empty)+4
climateExpertiseDescriptionPresent (non-null, non-empty)+4
committeesArray length > 0+4
managementRolesArray length > 0+4
remunerationLinked= true+4

Strategy Section (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
physicalTransitionImpactsDescription present+4
anticipatedImpactsDisclosed= true+4
scenarioAnalysesPresent (non-null, non-empty)+4
transitionPlanDisclosed= true+4
timeHorizons (short/med/long)All three defined+4

Risk Management Section (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
physicalRiskToolsPresent+5
transitionRiskToolsPresent+5
enterpriseRiskFrameworkPresent+5
climateRiskInRegister= true+5

Metrics Section (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
scope1TotalDisclosed (numeric value present)+4
scope2 (location or market)Either value disclosed+4
scope3TotalDisclosed (numeric value present)+4
emissionsIntensityMetrics array length > 0+4
riskMetricsPresent+4

Additional Disclosures Section (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
assuranceObtained= true+5
materialityAssessmentPresent+5
valueChainDescriptionPresent+5
externalFrameworksAlignedPresent / aligned+5
Notes

Each section is independently scored out of 20. The final Completeness score is the sum of all five sections (max 100).

"Present" means the field is non-null and, for strings, non-empty after trimming.

Dimension 2: Quantification Score

Scale: 0 – 100  |  Rewards providing hard numbers over qualitative statements

Scope 1 Emissions (15 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
scope1TotalNumeric total disclosed+8
scope1BySourceBreakdown by source provided+4
measurementStandardStandard specified (e.g. GHG Protocol)+3

Scope 2 Emissions (15 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
scope2LocationBasedLocation-based figure disclosed+5
scope2MarketBasedMarket-based figure disclosed+5
renewablePercentageRenewable energy % provided+5

Scope 3 Emissions (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
scope3Categories+2 points per category reportedmax +20
Notes

Each Scope 3 category reported earns 2 points. With 15 possible categories, the maximum is capped at 20 points (i.e., 10 or more categories = full marks).

Financial Impacts (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
currentFinancialImpactsQuantified with monetary values+10
anticipatedFinancialImpactsQuantified with monetary values+10

Emissions Intensity (15 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
intensityMetrics+5 per metric disclosedmax +15
Notes

Each emissions intensity metric (e.g., tCO2e per $M revenue, tCO2e per employee) earns 5 points. Three or more metrics = full marks (capped at 15).

Scenario Analysis (15 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
scenarioAnalysisAny scenarios present+5
quantitativeScenariosScenarios include quantitative data+10
Notes

Quantitative scenarios (those with numeric outcomes, temperature pathways, or financial modelling) earn the full 10-point bonus on top of the base 5 for having any scenarios.

Dimension 3: Governance Score

Scale: 0 – 100  |  Evaluates strength of climate governance structures

Board Oversight (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
oversightDescriptionDescription provided+10
reportingFrequencyFrequency specified (only if oversight exists)+10
Notes

Reporting frequency points are only awarded if the oversight description is present. Without oversight, frequency is irrelevant and scores 0.

Climate Expertise (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
expertiseMembersCount of members > 0+10
expertiseDescriptionDescription provided (only if members > 0)+10
Notes

Expertise description points are only awarded if at least one member with climate expertise exists. This prevents credit for vague statements without named personnel.

Dedicated Committee (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
committeeNameAny committee name contains "climate" or "sustainability" (case-insensitive)+20
Notes

This is an all-or-nothing check. A committee named "Sustainability and Risk Committee" would match. A generic "Board Risk Committee" without the keywords would not.

Remuneration Linkage (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
remunerationLinkedLinked to climate = true+10
remunerationDetailsDetails provided (only if linked)+10
Notes

Details points are conditional on the linkage being true. If remuneration is not linked, both sub-scores are 0.

Management Accountability (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
managementRoles+10 per role with climate responsibilitiesmax +20
Notes

Each management role identified with explicit climate responsibilities earns 10 points. Two or more roles = full marks (capped at 20).

Dimension 4: Target Ambition Score

Scale: 0 – 100  |  Measures ambition and rigour of emissions targets

Net Zero Target (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
targetNameAny target name contains "net zero" or "carbon neutral" (case-insensitive)+20

Target Year (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
targetYear <= 2040Most ambitious: by or before 2040+20
targetYear <= 2050Aligned with Paris Agreement mid-century+15
targetYear <= 2060Lagging pace+10
targetYear > 2060Beyond 2060 or not disclosed+0
Notes

Only the primary net-zero or main target year is evaluated. Earlier targets score higher because they imply faster decarbonisation.

Scope Coverage (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
All 3 scopes (1+2+3)Target covers Scope 1, 2, and 3+20
2 scopesTarget covers any 2 of 3 scopes+12
1 scopeTarget covers only 1 scope+6
Notes

Full-value supply chain targets (covering all 3 scopes) are considered best practice. Scope 3 inclusion is particularly important for most sectors.

Interim Targets (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
interimTargets >= 22+ unique target years before 2050+20
interimTargets == 11 interim target year before 2050+10
interimTargets == 0No interim milestones+0
Notes

Interim targets demonstrate a credible pathway to the final goal. Only distinct target years before 2050 are counted.

Science Alignment (20 pts)

Field / ConditionRulePoints
targetName / targetStatusContains "sbti" or "science-based" (case-insensitive)+20
Notes

This check scans both the target name and target status fields for Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) references. Exact keyword matching is used: "sbti" or "science-based".

Overall Score Computation

Overall Score = Completeness × 0.25 + Quantification × 0.25 + Governance × 0.25 + Target Ambition × 0.25

= ( C + Q + G + T ) / 4

Result is rounded to 2 decimal places.

Each dimension is independently scored on a 0 – 100 scale before being combined.

Null or missing data fields are treated as 0 points. No penalties are applied; scores can only go up.

Sub-scores within each dimension are capped at their stated maximum (e.g., Scope 3 categories cap at 20 points regardless of how many categories are reported beyond 10).

Conditional points (marked “only if”) enforce dependency: the prerequisite must be satisfied before bonus points can be awarded.